Business Outlook
June 2008
Seeking favourable conditions for germination
Another month has come and gone. The June
reading of the National Bank Business Outlook
eerily resembles that of May. Business
confidence has once again nudged higher. A net
39 percent expect worse times over the year
ahead, up from a net 50 percent last month. But
when we look at the detail, the move appears to
lack conviction, and pricing intentions continue
to rise.
The underlying economy remains very weak. Own
activity expectations, which provide a better
indication of overall economic growth, remain
unchanged from last month with a net 4 percent
expecting tougher times. This is the fourth
successive month firms’ own activity
expectations have been negative. Not since 1988
have we seen firms’ own activity expectations
remain so consistently weak. We’ve said it
before and we’ll say it again. When this
indicator is negative, the economy is moving
backwards. Employment intentions continue to ebb
lower. A net 12 percent expect labour market
conditions to worsen. Investment intentions
slipped another notch in the month, with a net 3
percent expecting a decline. Collectively, our
composite growth indicator from the survey
remains in negative territory.
Taking on a more positive tone, we are in no
doubt that the seeds of an upswing and the all
important realignment in the composition to
growth are very slowly being sown. The NZ dollar
is starting to correct, although more slowly
versus the all important US dollar. If the
greenback is going down, we struggle to do the
same. The Reserve Bank has moved to an easing
bias and rate cuts look to be just around the
corner. Fiscal policy is delivering impetus via
tax cuts late in the year. But given the
combination of global unease, surging oil
prices, leverage, and pressure on household
budgets from burgeoning food related inflation;
the adjustment we are embarking on, and one
which we have talked about for some time, will
be elongated in nature as the piper is paid.
In many ways the length of the downturn rests in
businesses’ hands. Diminished revenue growth and
pressure on costs is forcing firms to look more
closely at extracting efficiencies and
productivity, both pre-cursors to the next
cyclical upswing. This is the next leg (and
rather painful one to those who have not
experienced a rising unemployment rate before)
of the economic cycle that New Zealand must
embark on. Productivity growth, by definition,
requires more output for less input. A muddle
through type response will result in a muddle
through recovery. A deeper hole may be a
prerequisite to climbing out with sustainable
vigour.

The New Zealand economy is navigating through
three shocks at once: a housing shock, the worst global credit conditions in
50 years, and a commodity price shock. The latter presents a great
opportunity (i.e. surging soft commodity prices), but also poses threats in
the form of higher inflation. Plotting a path for the economy and guiding it
safely through such a myriad of headwinds is a tall order for monetary
policy alone. The Reserve Bank has encouragingly signalled a preparedness to
look through the temporary spike in inflation, and we expect two to three
rate cuts before year end. A July start remains a distinct possibility. But
pricing intentions (within a net 41 percent expecting to raise prices) have
now risen to the highest reading since 2000, and inflation expectations
continue to nudge up. There is a limit as to how far monetary policy
reflation can go in a world of inflation.
Help from other areas would also not go astray.
Monetary policy has been, and always will be, the primary stabilisation
instrument which we rely on in terms of keeping output, employment, and
inflation around a longer-term sustainable trend. Yet, moving forward, the
global economy is becoming increasingly integrated. Globalisation and the
emergence of Asia have brought tremendous benefit to New Zealand in the form
of free flows of capital and technology, migration, lower prices for
manufactured goods, higher commodity prices, and a centre of economic
gravity that is moving closer towards New Zealand. However, there is no free
lunch.
Globalisation comes with challenges. We see
greater volatility in the currency, capital flows and commodity prices,
including oil. The long end of the New Zealand yield curve is heavily
influenced by offshore developments. More recently we have seen massive
swings in the price of credit.
In a rapidly integrating world, we need to look
wider and to other stabilisation mechanisms, particularly when faced with
multiple external shocks. This does not mean that monetary policy needs more
levers to pull, rather it needs more friends. Indeed, while we have other
stabilisation mechanisms such as a freely floating exchange rate and a
flexible labour market — both critical components of New Zealand’s economic
framework — fiscal policy is typically overlooked. Central government
spending is equivalent to a third of GDP. They have the biggest balance
sheet in the economy and they control the regulatory framework, a key
productivity inhibitor at present. Unlike businesses, Governments do not (or
seldom) go broke. Of course, the majority of fiscal policy decisions should
be set within a medium-term context.
However, the turn in the economic cycle has been
too aggressive and no let up is in sight. Now is not the time for fiscal
policy to be idly standing by, leaving it all up to automatic stabilisers.
If you would like to become a respondent to our survey, send an email to
economics@nbnz.co.nz with your business location and industry
sector. For details on the nature and performance of the Business Outlook on
to
www.nationalbank.co.nz/economics/outlook/pdf/BOBackgroundPaper.pdf
This background paper also contains enrolment forms for new survey
respondents.
The tables can be viewed as charts on our
Business Outlook charts page.
Survey Results
Net Balance
June 2008 |
Total |
Previous
Month |
Retail |
Mfg |
Agric |
Constrn |
Services |
|
Business
Confidence |
-38.7 |
-49.7 |
-43.2 |
-42.4 |
-46.4 |
-21.9 |
-34.2 |
|
Activity
Outlook |
-4.0 |
-4.4 |
-9.9 |
-8.1 |
7.1 |
-21.2 |
-2.1 |
|
| Exports |
14.5 |
11.5 |
... |
14.8 |
... |
... |
... |
|
| Investment |
-2.6 |
-1.6 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
-13.0 |
-6.3 |
-3.1 |
|
| Livestock |
-3.5 |
-7.5 |
... |
... |
-3.5 |
... |
... |
|
Capacity
Utilisation |
1.3 |
4.6 |
-10.7 |
1.7 |
9.1 |
13.3 |
-3.1 |
|
|
| Residential Construction |
-21.1 |
-37.5 |
... |
... |
... |
-21.1 |
... |
|
| Commercial Construction |
-14.3 |
-61.9 |
... |
... |
... |
-14.3 |
... |
|
| Employment |
-11.9 |
-9.2 |
-13.6 |
-21.2 |
-2.9 |
-33.3 |
-8.2 |
|
Unemployment
Rate |
74.6 |
72.3 |
75.0 |
78.8 |
67.1 |
66.7 |
75.8 |
|
| Profits |
-18.9 |
-25.1 |
-27.2 |
-24.4 |
0.0 |
-39.4 |
-17.4 |
|
Interest
Rates |
-34.8 |
-23.7 |
-27.2 |
-24.7 |
-31.3 |
-39.4 |
-41.0 |
|
Pricing
Intentions |
41.2 |
36.4 |
49.4 |
49.4 |
44.3 |
33.3 |
34.9 |
|
Inflation
Expectations |
3.49 |
3.44 |
3.44 |
3.51 |
3.47 |
3.55 |
3.50 |